By: Sean Peters
Date-time group: 211831Z MAR 88
Location: 2102N5 15807W1 – Pearl Harbor OPAREAS
Scene 1: USS Brewton (FF 1086) operations office. ENS Peters, the Electronics Material Officer (EMO) is having a discussion his department head, LT Brown (OPS), about the status of the AN/SPS-40B air search radar, which is inoperable.
Peters: Morning, OPS.
Brown: So, EMO, what’s the status of the 40 repair? It’s been down for quite a while now.
Peters: Umm, sir, they’re still troubleshooting it.
Brown: Actually, no they’re not. Your guys discovered late last night that the magnetron had failed, and we’re going to have to CASREP the thing because we don’t have the part in stock. I guess I don’t need to ask whether you’ve written the CASREP yet. How come I know more about this situation than you do?
Peters: …
Scene 2: USS Brewton OE division office, later that morning. ENS Peters is discussing the situation with ETC Bibb, the leading CPO for the division.
Peters: Chief, you’re killing me with this SPS-40 thing. How come you’re giving this info straight to OPS? I look like a dumbass now.
Bibb: Sir, you weren’t around. And he came in and asked. What was I going to do? I had to tell him something.
Peters: Umm, ok. Can you at least give me a call next time if he gets to you first?
Bibb: Sure thing, sir.
….
Date-time group: 062133 JUN 89
Location: 2150N8 15843W1 – near Kauai
Scene 3: USS Brewton (FF 1086) Engineering Log Room. The Chief Engineer (CHENG), LT Powell, is examining the tagout log. DC3 Fentress is on watch in the space.
(over the 1MC): [boson’s pipe]: Heads forward of frame 77 are secured until further notice.
Powell: That’s odd. Fentress, do you know what that’s about?
Fentress: No, sir.
Powell: Where’s Mr. Henderson?
Fentress: Haven’t seen him since quarters, sir.
Powell (via 21MC): Bridge, DC.
OOD (via 21MC): Bridge aye.
Powell: Why are the heads secured up forward?
OOD: We got a report that that the head in the forward crew berthing was overflowing, and the HTs were investigating. They requested heads be secured for the time being.
Powell: In the future, please be sure you discuss this kind of thing with me before making an announcement – the CO is going to be calling me for an explanation.
OOD: Bridge aye.
Powell (to Fentress): I’m headed for the forward CHT pump room to see if I can figure out what’s going on. If you see Mr. Henderson, have him join me up there.
Fentress: No problem, CHENG.
…
Scene 4: The forward CHT pump room. Two petty officers have removed a spool piece from a 6”, floor to ceiling pipe, and are ramming a device that resembles a large plumber’s snake into it. HT1 Loconte is supervising them. LT Powell enters the space.
Powell: Morning, HT1. What’s going on?
Loconte: Sir, the shitters in the forward crew’s head started overflowing, and we figured the problem was that this downcomer was blocked.
Powell (looks closer): Uhh, HT1. This pipe runs all the way to the forward head in officer’s country – it’s like 4 stories high. What’s going to happen when they…
Powell is interrupted by a flood of raw sewage, which splashes over everyone in the space and accumulates to a depth of a few inches on the deck.
Powell: God dammit. Ok, call up to Fentress and have some of your other guys get into their poopy suits and start cleaning this up. (weak laughter from the petty officers)
Powell (glaring at the petty officers): we’re going to have to clean ourselves up and report to sickbay for a gamma globulin shot.
…
Scene 5: Passageway through lower officer’s country. A fragrant LT Powell is on his way to his stateroom when LTJG Henderson (Damage Control Assistant, Division officer for R division) emerges from his stateroom.
Powell (attempting to maintain composure): Well, DCA. Explain yourself. What were you doing while I was supervising your troops?
Henderson (blinks several times): Uhhh, I was… keeping myself informed.
Powell (losing temper): YOU STUMBLE OUT OF YOUR STATEROOM, THIRD DEGREE RACK BURNS ON YOUR FACE, AND HAVE THE NERVE TO TELL ME THAT YOU WERE “KEEPING YOURSELF INFORMED”? (tirade goes on at length, about Henderson’s many shortcomings).
LTJG Henderson (not his real name) was relieved the next day, to be replaced by, uhhh, LTJG Peters. Also: “keeping oneself informed” became a synonym for “having a nap” for the rest of my time on the ship.
Date time group: 090332Z JAN 94
Location: 3654N8 07433W7 – Virginia Capes OPAREAS
Scene 6: USS Kalamazoo (AOR 6), conducting night underway replenishment (UNREP) with USS George Washington (CVN 73). The operations officer, LT Peters, emerges onto the signal bridge. SM2 Singletary and an SMSN are on watch.
Peters: Holy shit, it’s cold up here. I’m glad I put my coat on.
Singletary: Yes, sir. The QMs said it was down to 23. I heard it might snow later. I’m kind of surprised you could be up here, sir. Aren’t you busy during these things?
Peters: Actually, I get really busy setting it up and then getting us to the rendezvous, but once we’re on station, it’s all 1st LT and CHENG’s baby. Have you heard any news on your Seaman-to-Admiral package (author’s note: a commissioning program)?
Singletary: No sir. NC1 says it could take several months to hear.
Peters: Ok, well I’ll… (notices a blinking light from the carrier)… you got one coming in.
Singletary rushes to the flashing light station to assist the other watchstander, who’s still under instruction. They take down the message, returning occasional acknowledgement blinks as it comes in.
Singletary: Your timing is good, sir. This is their fire control officer, who wants to know if we can issue them this part (provides a chit with the message, including an NSN).
Peters: all right, I’ll go check. Do you need anything up here?
Singletary: well, sir, we could use some coffee, but the MS’s won’t give us any.
Peters: why the hell not?
Singletary: they said they had just washed the urns and weren’t making any more coffee right now.
Peters: God dammit, I’ll go grab the SUPPO.
Scene 7: USS Kalamazoo (AOR 6) wardroom. ENS Steele, communications officer and OC division officer, is watching a movie with some other junior officers. CDR Bird (SC), Supply Officer, is at the wardroom table looking at some paperwork.
Peters: SUPPO, I need some help. It’s like a billion degrees below zero on the signal bridge and the signalmen could really use some coffee.
Bird: Well, they can just call down to the mess decks.
Peters: They did that, but the MS’s turned them away. Said they weren’t making coffee right now.
Bird: those dumbasses. I’ll go have coffee sent up.
Peters: Can you also check to see if we can issue GW this part (hands SUPPO the chit)? We need to know real quick so we can get it to them before the UNREP is over.
Bird: I’ll check that right now too.
Peters: Thanks, SUPPO. I really appreciate it.
Peters: COMMO, can you step out into the passageway for a minute?
Peters (after stepping into passageway with Steele): Mr. Steele, have you checked on your signalmen lately? I don’t know if you heard my last conversation, but it’s cold as fuck up there.
Steele: Uhhh, no sir, I haven’t.
Peters: Well, I took care of their coffee situation. How about you go show some concern and go up there. Make sure they’re properly dressed. And wear a coat yourself.
Steele: Aye aye, sir.
…
The moral: junior officers, be with your troops. There’s a temptation to focus your attention on the meeting with the CO, or that paperwork you need to get taken care of, or getting your own qualifications squared away. And those things are important. But the action is with your soldiers/sailors/Marines/airmen. Sometimes they have information you need. Sometimes they’re not going about a job in the right way, which might get someone hurt. Sometimes their working conditions need to be fixed. Sometimes they need some horsepower from you to fix these things.
And sometimes, there’s not a thing you can really do to help, but you can still be there to at least share the misery with them. You care about their work and their well-being, right? Show it. Be with your troops. They need you.















Political Correctness Does Not Belong on the Frontline
By: Peter Sessum
Most people have taken the fact she is holding a gun out of the discussion when it is the only thing that makes her a target. Contrary to early reporting, the picture with the verse of the Quran is behind her and not part of the cutout.
There is a vicious, misogynistic attack against Muslim women involving the U.S. Navy and it needs to stop. Women who are almost universally believed to be oppressed by their culture are being attacked in a way they never thought possible. Currently, Political Correctness (PC) is trying to limit and marginalize women of the Islamic faith.
The U.S. Navy, which has been making strides towards equality by being the first to place women in jobs previously only open to men has backed down due to political pressure. This move not only continues the subtle oppression of Muslim women, but might cost lives in the future.
The PC police are criticizing the use a woman wearing a hijab, the head scarf worn by Muslim women to cover the hair, as a target in a kill house. If that were the case, I would understand. The term “kill house” sounds bad. And setting up targets of Muslim women for Navy SEALs to shoot at seems wrong, but before we take that leap, allow me a moment to talk you off the ledge.
First we must discuss terminology. The military always has very dry, academic names for everything. Then a more accurate term, shorter term is given by the people that actually use it. So the area that is used as a “life fire, target simulation engagement training area” is called “kill house” by the guys who use it. Basically, it is a series of rooms with thick enough walls to stop bullets where combat troops can practice tactics using life rounds. All elite forces use them, even you local SWAT team. Because they are expensive, not to mention dangerous, most soldiers, sailor, Marines will never train in one.
The other term is “target.” I know this is silly, but it is important. At a live fire range EVERYTHING is a target. If it is a cardboard cutout of something, it is called a target. Yes, even the little puppy picture is called a target. However, it is a “no shoot” target. I know this is difficult for civilians to wrap their head around, but just trust me on this.
In a “kill house” there are a number of “targets” placed randomly in different rooms. The shooter (appropriately named because they have guns and shoot stuff) move through the building clearing each room. Some targets are placed in such a way that it is not immediately visible what is on the front of them. The purpose is to engage the “threat” targets and not shoot the “friendly” ones. A threat is anyone with a weapon, a friendly is anyone unarmed.
Not a very realistic training unless we start getting attacked by grey gym teachers from the 1950s.
If you ever watched an old cop show or ever been to a shooting range you have seen the pictures of the shady guy with a revolver. Those are the kind of targets that were used. On the raid to take out Osama Bin Laden, there were no 1950 back alley muggers in the Pakistani compound. There were, however Islamic men and women. That is not racist, it is fact. OBL was pretty serious about Islam being the best thing ever. He only surrounded himself with like minded individual. Like other Muslims.
If we ever go to war with the Vatican you can bet there will be targets of priests and nuns in Special Operation kill houses. I know that Mother Teresa was a great lady and I was a fan of Pope John Paul, but if our enemy was exclusively Catholic, it would not be wrong to have a cardinal as a kill house target. The messed up part is that there are people who are crying about this current event that would not have a problem with a catholic target. What do you think that says about them?
We also need to clear up a couple misconceptions. The target did not have a verse from the Quran on it. The target was in front of a wall that had the verse in a frame. The reason is because the entire training environment was made up to look like the dwelling of a terrorist or an insurgent safe house. These training scenarios are made to look as realistic as possible. A high level terrorist would not have posters of Dale Earnhardt and a Coors light neon sign.
A lot of people jumped the gun (pun intended) to accuse the Navy of religious insensitivity. If any target was made with a verse from the Quran attached I would say that is a dick move. It is unnecessary and counterproductive to the training. Being insensitive for the sake of being insensitive is stupid. And needlessly drawing attention to the military is stupid. However, that isn’t the case.
As for the target itself. The subject is armed. She is not being targeted because she is Muslim, she is being targeted because she is armed. As a person with experience in this very area, deadly force is only authorized, or I other words legal, against a threat. It would be a war crime to shoot a person simply because they are a Muslim. This is an armed combatant.
That is not the only piece of information some article neglected to mention. There are multiple versions of the target. Some have her holding an animal, a flower or some other nonthreatening object. This is important so that the SEALs are training to look for a weapon, not for a specific looking target. If the is a woman in white hijab with a gun and a woman in a black hijab with a flower, the men would get lazy and just look for the white hijab. This might mean they would make a mistake in a real life scenario and ignore a woman in a black hijab with a grenade.
In a dynamic building clearing scenario that the SEALS would find themselves in being able to distinguish between who is a threat and who is not quickly is very important. The Navy is actually treating women the same as men in this regard. By having both armed men and women, they are saying that women can just as easily fight for what they believe as a man can.
Are women capable of fighting for a cause they believe in or is she just holding the rifle and grenades for her husband like a good little Muslim wife?
The people who oppose this are saying otherwise. On a personal note, I hope that Jihadists continue to think of women as not worthy to fight the infidels. If they did, there would be twice the numbers to fight. Upper body strength is not a factor in pushing a button on a vest or driving a vehicle filled with explosives.
But what about the allegedly enlightened, free thinkers that are up in arms (I meant that one too) about this issue? Aren’t they also saying that it isn’t possible for a woman to fight for what she believes? Jihadists do not think of themselves as murderers, they believe they have the highest of callings. Are we saying that women are not capable of that too?
People are drawn to power and influence and OBL was at the top of his game so to speak. Is it really impossible to believe that at least one woman wouldn’t be attracted to that and share his beliefs? Can people not believe that a woman would fight, and even die for the man she loved and the cause she believed in?
Some of these same people are also saying that women should be allowed in the Infantry. So I guess they are saying that American Christian women can fight as well as a man but that Muslim women can’t. This is a plain and simple prejudice. Based purely on a choice to wear the hijab, people are saying that not only can the women not be fighters, but should be removed from the scenario all together.
Like always, the military is forced to bow to political pressure and conform to the ideals of political correctness rather than focus on doing what it is supposed to do. Defend the country “against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Nowhere does it specify gender.